🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."